Top suggestions for Which of the following statements best describe the purpose of non-binding instruments and advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice in international law? Select all that apply. Group of answer choices They are binding on all states once adopted by the UN General Assembly. They are used to express political commitments or normative expectations without creating enforceable obligations. They reflect emerging consensus or state practice and can influence the development of customary international law. They can guide courts, treaty bodies, and policymakers in applying international law. They clarify legal principles and help interpret binding obligations. They have no legal value and are generally ignored in international practice. |