The 2026 Womble Bond Dickinson Client Survey reveals a business landscape in which innovation, especially artificial intelligence, is advancing faster than regulatory clarity.
A US court in the Heppner case rules AI tools are not confidential, treating them as third parties and warning that sharing sensitive data may waive legal protections.
Sagar Ravi and Joe McClure of McDermott Will & Schulte examine a recent Southern District of New York ruling that communications with generative AI are not privileged and explore its application to ...
In this insightful interview, Richard Jaenisch, senior director of Education, Outreach, and Digital Experience at Open ...
By combining top-tier talent with enterprise-level protection, we create an environment where clients can scale ...
Mohr Marketing, LLC, the nation’s leading innovator in compliant legal intake and marketing infrastructure, today announced the national expansion of its Police Report Program—a groundbreaking, ...
Enterprises have tethered their most consequential operations to AI agents & neglected to secure the ingress. This article explains the gravity of this threat.
Just as AI is substantially escalating privacy risks, we're headed in the wrong direction when it comes to resourcing privacy ...
QualDerm says hackers stole the personal, medical, and health insurance information of over 3.1 million people from its ...
A recent decision from the SDNY, United States v. Heppner, has generated outsized commentary suggesting that the use of generative AI tools may jeopardize attorney-client privilege. A closer reading ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results