By Frank Pingue TORONTO, July 3 (Reuters) - The World Cup has given the Canadian Premier League plenty to discuss with FIFA after a disallowed Cristiano Ronaldo goal was among 17 that would have stood under a revised offside interpretation its top flight is trialling,

Julian Quinones was beyond the last Ecuador defender. Despite that, the Mexican winger wasn't called offside. Half a field later, Quinones had tucked away the match's first goal for a 1-0 Mexico lead at home in Mexico City.

For a few moments, it looked like Iran had found the goal that would send it through. Then VAR stepped in.

The law governing its modern application has 45 clauses and runs to more than 1,000 words. A former Premier League referee explains all

Shoja Khalilzadeh scored in the third minute of stoppage time, putting Iran up 2-1 over Egypt and setting off pandemonium throughout the stadium. And then the most dreaded words in soccer were seen. VAR REVIEW.

Colombia and Portugal generated staggering ticket prices at the 2026 FIFA men's World Cup, and the match lived up to the hype.

It looked like Colombia would be victorious after Davinson Sánchez appeared to score in second-half stoppage time, but the goal was quickly ruled offside. Colombia ended Saturday in a 0-0 draw with Portugal.

A viral claim alleged that the 2026 FIFA World Cup VAR team for Belgium vs. Iran was Israeli after a VAR review disallowed a goal.

Colombia appeared to have a game-winning goal in stoppage time against Portugal, but Davinson Sánchez was offside by the narrowest of margins.